Two independent studies. One shared shelf.
Choose the research lens that fits the design decision in front of you. Both libraries credit the same starting references; each follows a different method.
8 studies
48 dated captures
Desktop and mobile evidence sit beside article anatomy, reader utilities, accessibility tradeoffs, dated scores, and explicitly limited inferences.
Use this lens for: responsive recomposition, evidence quality, orientation, and implementation transfer.
Open the OC field guide12 source studies
1 composite article
Computed-style forensics, source-matched reports, a broader visual-narrative corpus, and a design system organized around visual cadence.
Use this lens for: measured tokens, visual cadence, pattern synthesis, and design-system translation.
Open the CC libraryOC asks how a long article behaves across screens and how strong the evidence is. CC asks which visual systems, measured tokens, and cadence patterns can be rebuilt.
Neither library is the canonical answer. Agreement is stronger evidence; disagreement is a useful prompt to inspect the source again.